DR. CRAIG REESE,
D.C., P.C.
April 2007 Newsletter
Click here
for printer friendly easy-read version
Vitamins
Kill
I know yesterday
was April Fool’s Day but this is not a hoax headline. Last month
some of you may have seen this headline or heard about it on the news.
I’m sure it caused a lot of confusion in your minds about what is
the real story on vitamins. Well it is true that SYNTHETIC VITAMINS KILL
and has been proven many times in various studies. Vitamins found in food
and vitamins made from whole foods make people healthy. The article below
was posted on the web by a guy named Mike Adams (http://www.healthranger.org/)
who has no ties to any vitamin or drug company and is only interested
in getting out the truth about health. This was posted on http://www.newstarget.com/021653.html
and says what I wanted to say so completely that it is copied below:
The latest round
in conventional medicine's ongoing attempts to discredit (and ultimately
outlaw) nutritional supplements is found in a highly questionable study
published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association,
which claims that vitamins actually increase the risk of death.
The study claims
to have analyzed a collection of previous studies on Vitamin A, beta carotene,
Vitamin C, Vitamin E and selenium, concluding that most of the nutrients
are actually dangerous to human health.
Of course, this is
research from conventional medicine – an industry that promotes
patented chemicals as perfectly safe, even though FDA-approved pharmaceuticals
are killing 100,000 Americans each year. (Imagine the uproar if vitamins
killed even a fraction of that number…)
To avoid getting
hoodwinked by questionable research on "vitamins," you have
to strongly consider the financial interests of the source of this research.
JAMA accepts millions of dollars in advertising from drug companies each
year, and its pages are absolutely packed with drug ads. The American
Medical Association, for its part, has long worked to discredit alternative
medicine and has even been found guilty by U.S. federal courts of engaging
in a conspiracy to destroy chiropractic medicine. The AMA, which is largely
considered a joke by anyone familiar with natural health, is hardly a
credible source for publishing scientific findings on nutrition. To protect
the multi-billion dollar drug industry, the AMA would say practically
anything, I believe.
How
to fake a vitamin study
Faking a vitamin
study to show supplements as harmful is extremely easy to pull off, by
the way. All you have to do is use synthetic forms of the vitamins and
avoid using natural, food-sourced vitamins. These synthetic vitamins –
which are really just industrial chemicals – may be called "Vitamin
E" or "Vitamin A" or even "Vitamin C" but they
have no functional resemblance to the real vitamins that occur in nature.
Every single study over the past two decades that has sought to discredit
Vitamin E, for example, focused on using synthetic Vitamin E in order
to show harm. It is curious that no researcher from the world of conventional
medicine will ever test the natural, full-spectrum vitamins, nutrients
and phytochemicals that appear in nature. You know why? Because they would
discover a universe of natural medicine that makes patented prescription
drugs obsolete.
A second way to fake
a vitamin meta-data study is to simply cherry-pick the results you want
to include in your meta-data analysis. This is a routine trick used by
dishonest researchers who have an agenda of discrediting nutritional supplements.
To pull this one off, they simply eliminate all previous studies that
showed positive results for vitamins, and include only previous studies
that showed negative results. Then they run a statistical analysis on
all the studies they hand-picked and declare – surprise! –
those vitamins are dangerous! Many of the studies on vitamin E, by the
way, were conducted on dying heart patients who were only expected to
live two weeks, regardless of what they took.
A third way to distort
the science is to confuse people with statistical obfuscation. The reporting
on this particular study, for example, confuses absolute risk with relative
risk. Vitamin A, according to the reports on this study, increased mortality
risk by 16 percent. But that is a relative risk number, meaning that if
1 person out of 100 normally died, then 1.16 people out of 100 would die
when taking these synthetic Vitamin A supplements. In other words, it
might not even be one additional person out of 100, or even out of 1000.
And yet, it is curious
that when conventional medical researchers report the results of mortality
risks for their prescription drugs, they always use absolute risk. They
say things like, "Well, this drug only increased the risk by one
percent." But what they are not saying is that it may be a 200% relative
increase in mortality risk, depending on the baseline absolute mortality
numbers. So if only 0.5 people out of 100 normally died from heart disease
during a particular study, but 1.5 people died when taking a drug during
that study, the relative risk increase is 200%. But the medical journals
and the mainstream media will report is at a "one percent increase."
You see how the game
is played? Here's the con:
• All statistics
on the dangers of prescription drugs are reported as absolute risk to
make the numbers seem smaller (and make drugs seem safe).
• All statistics
on the dangers of synthetic vitamins are reported as relative risk to
make the numbers seem larger (and vitamins seem dangerous).
And this is how conventional
medicine lies with statistics. It's only one of the many tricks used to
disinform the American public about the dangers of pharmaceuticals or
the benefits of nutrition.
This research published
in JAMA does remind us of one important point, however: synthetic chemicals
are harmful to human health. If you take cheap "vitamins" made
of these synthetic chemicals, you are doing yourself more harm than good.
These cheap vitamin manufacturers, by the way, are usually owned by pharmaceutical
firms. I would personally never take vitamins purchased at common retailers
such as Wal-Mart or Walgreens. I only recommend and consume vitamins from
high-end nutritional supplement companies.
Blurring
the line to scare consumers
But conventional
medicine researchers try to blur the line between "junk vitamins"
and "quality vitamins" by classifying all nutritional supplements
as "vitamins," regardless of what they're really made from.
By discrediting a few synthetic chemicals, they can effectively dissuade
the masses from taking ANY vitamins, including the good ones. And that
is, of course, their goal: to use FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) to
scare consumers away from nutritional supplements so that patients will
flock to the patented, synthetic chemicals that earn drug companies billions
of dollars in profits. Drugs make money for Big Pharma, and vitamins compete
with drug sales. Once you understand the economics and the motives of
the parties involved here, the junk science con becomes quite obvious:
Pushers of pharmaceuticals will always use dirty tricks to discredit nutritional
supplements because it is in their financial interests to do so.
My own financial
interests, by the way, are squeaky clean. I sell no supplements, I earn
no money from supplement companies, and in fact I am not even paid by
NewsTarget for my work on these articles. In terms of potential conflicts
of interest, I have far more credibility than the AMA, a shady organization
that remains mired in blatant conflicts of interest and a frightening
agenda of pushing drugs, surgery and radiation onto as many Americans
as possible.
Now, here's a common
sense way to quickly realize the JAMA research is complete nonsense. Round
up 100 people who are taking multiple pharmaceuticals, and compare their
health to 100 people who are taking vitamins and nutritional supplements.
Guess who's healthier? The supplement crowd will be healthier every time.
It's the obvious question: If vitamins are so dangerous, where are all
the dead vitamin takers? And if pharmaceuticals are so safe, where are
all the super-healthy prescription drug patients? They are nowhere to
be found.
The healthiest people,
by far, are those who take supplements, who engage in regular exercise,
and who avoid taking prescription drugs.
Why
conventional medical researchers remain
nutritionally illiterate
Western medicine
still doesn't "get" nutrition. They think all health effects
are achieved by single, isolated chemical constituents. But nutrition
doesn't work that way. In nature, for example, Vitamin C is not a single
chemical, but rather a symphony of complementary phytonutrients that work
in concert. Conventional medical researchers almost never test plant medicine
using full-spectrum nutrients. Why? Because they don't understand the
concept of nutritional synergy.
The bottom line?
Only fools believe research about nutrition that comes from the American
Medical Association or its journal. Conventional medical researchers declaring
that vitamins are worthless is about as credible as Bush Administration
climatologists claiming there's no such thing as global warming.
With the publication
of this research, the distortion of health reality is now complete. According
to the Americal Medical Association, vitamins will kill you but pharmaceuticals
will make you healthy.
Someone help me stop
laughing before I blow out a lung and require surgery. (end of article)
Amen
to that!
Dr. Royal Lee was
making this argument back in the 30’s, 40’s, 50’s and
60’s and was harassed by the AMA and the food corporations his whole
professional life. That is why he started Standard Process Vitamins and
first formulated Catalyn back in 1929 made from 12 raw organic foods.
Every time a new vitamin is "found", they test Catalyn and it
is already in there. Whole food nutrition gives you whole health. Fractionated
and synthesized vitamins cannot nourish the body and are just another
drug really and cause disease. Synthetic vitamins and synthetic foods
are cheap to buy but expensive to your health in the long run. Eating
whole organic foods and taking whole food-based supplements are the cheapest
form of health insurance you could possibly buy. Have a great month and
enjoy this Spring weather!
Home
|